PrivacyProxy vs OpenRouter

Which LLM proxy fits your requirements? Direct comparison for developers and startups with focus on GDPR compliance.

Quick Verdict

OpenRouter provides access to 300+ models with one API key. PrivacyProxy focuses on GDPR compliance with automatic PII masking. Both are "Bring Your Own Key" solutions.

PrivacyProxy: Better for GDPR OpenRouter: Better for Model Variety
OpenRouter
vs
PrivacyProxy

What's the Difference?

OpenRouter

Unified API gateway to 300+ LLM models. One API key, all providers. Focus on developer experience and model routing.

openrouter.ai

PrivacyProxy

GDPR-compliant LLM proxy with automatic PII masking. Sensitive data is anonymized before cloud transmission.

privacyproxy.dev

Feature Comparison

Feature OpenRouter PrivacyProxy
Available Models 300+ models 64 providers (via BYOK)
PII Masking No Automatic (420+ patterns)
GDPR Compliance Enterprise Only (EU Routing) Standard (all plans)
Server Location USA (EU only Enterprise) Germany
Zero Data Retention Enterprise Only Standard (RAM only)
Bring Your Own Key Optional Standard
Pricing Model Pay-per-Token + Markup Flat Fee (no markup)
Integration Own API + OpenAI compatible OpenAI compatible (drop-in)
Request Logging Standard (opt-out available) No logging
Code Audit Available No (Closed Source) Yes (on request)

When to Choose Which?

Choose OpenRouter if...

  • You need access to 300+ models with one key
  • Model fallback and auto-routing are important
  • GDPR is not a critical concern
  • You have enterprise budget for EU routing

Choose PrivacyProxy if...

  • You work with customer data in prompts
  • GDPR compliance is required
  • Data must never leave the EU
  • You serve healthcare, legal, or finance

Privacy Deep Dive

OpenRouter Privacy

  • Requests are logged by default
  • data_collection: "deny" prevents provider logging
  • EU in-region routing only for Enterprise
  • Zero Data Retention (ZDR) only for Enterprise
  • Servers in USA (CLOUD Act applicable)

PrivacyProxy Privacy

  • PII is masked BEFORE transmission
  • 420+ detection patterns (DACH + EU-27)
  • Servers in Germany
  • No request logging (RAM only)
  • Code audit available on request

Integration Comparison

OpenRouter Integration
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
  base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
  api_key="sk-or-..."  # OpenRouter Key
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
  model="openai/gpt-4o",
  messages=[{"role": "user", ...}]
)
PrivacyProxy Integration
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
  base_url="https://api.privacyproxy.dev/v1",
  api_key="sk-..."  # Your OpenAI Key
)

# Same code - PII auto-masked!
response = client.chat.completions.create(
  model="gpt-4o",
  messages=[{"role": "user", ...}]
)

Both are OpenAI compatible. With PrivacyProxy, you only change the base_url - your existing code works immediately.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use both together?
Technically yes, but it doesn't make sense. You'd have double latency and costs (User → OpenRouter → PrivacyProxy → Provider). Choose one.
Which is cheaper?
Depends on usage. OpenRouter has token markup (5-20%), PrivacyProxy flat fee (€29-99/mo). At high volume, PrivacyProxy is often cheaper.
Do I need PrivacyProxy if I use EU providers?
Even with EU providers like Mistral, personal data lands on their servers. PrivacyProxy masks BEFORE transmission - that's defense in depth.
Does PrivacyProxy support all OpenRouter models?
PrivacyProxy supports 64 providers directly. You bring your own API keys - giving you access to all models from those providers.

GDPR Compliance Without Compromise

Use your favorite LLM providers with automatic PII masking. Only change 3 lines of code.